Reflections on HCI 3.0

Article information

Health New Media Res. 2024;8(2):56-58
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 December 21
doi : https://doi.org/10.22720/hnmr.2024.00192
1Department of Communication and Media, Dong-Eui University, South Korea
Corresponding author: Jisoo Ahn, Department of Communication and Media, Dong-Eui University, South Korea, Email: jahn@deu.ac.kr
Received 2024 December 14; Revised 2024 December 18; Accepted 2024 December 20.

Abstract

Jin-Woo Kim’s HCI 3.0 explores the evolution of human-computer interaction in response to AI advancements. The book introduces Human-AI Interaction (HAII), emphasizing the need for adaptive design principles that account for AI’s autonomous decision-making capabilities. Moving beyond traditional HCI 2.0 frameworks, Kim highlights how AI-driven systems require new interaction paradigms to remain effective. The book systematically presents a digital product design framework, blending theory with practical insights. It underscores the importance of user-centered design in AI applications, particularly in fields like digital health. Kim revisits core HCI concepts and contextualizes them within AI systems’ limitations and probabilistic nature. The work offers valuable guidance for researchers, educators, and professionals seeking to integrate AI into their design processes. By balancing theoretical discussion and real-world examples, HCI 3.0 provides a comprehensive resource for navigating the challenges of AI-enhanced interaction design. The book’s focus on clear communication and structured methodology makes it essential for understanding and designing meaningful interactions in an AI-driven world.

A Book Review on

HCI 3.0-Jin-Woo Kim (Paju, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea: Ahn Graphics), 2024, 480 pages, ISBN: 979-1168230750

In the wake of ChatGPT’s 2022 release, artificial intelligence has rapidly transformed our daily lives. This acceleration demands a reevaluation of traditional human-computer interaction (HCI) paradigms.

Recognizing this need for new paradigms, the challenges posed by AI’s rapid evolution demand innovative approaches. Jin-Woo Kim’s HCI 3.0 offers a comprehensive framework for understanding and designing interactions in an AI-driven world. Unlike traditional HCI, which focuses on users interacting with static systems, Human-AI Interaction (HAII) emphasizes dynamic interactions with AI systems capable of adaptation and learning. This shift requires new design approaches that consider AI’s proactive and evolving nature.

Building on his previous work, Introduction to HCI, which was lauded for making complex concepts accessible through real-world examples, Kim applies the same user-centered approach to AI-driven systems. In HCI 3.0, Kim builds on his user-centered approach to introduce HAII, highlighting the need for dynamic, adaptive interactions with AI systems capable of autonomous decision-making. In HCI 3.0, he continues this tradition by incorporating updated case studies that elucidate new HCI principles.

The book is structured to first provide a high-level overview of the HCI 3.0 digital product design framework, followed by a detailed, step-by-step explanation of its application. This systematic approach offers significant value for designers and researchers aiming to adapt to the evolving interaction landscape.

One of the book’s core strengths lies in its clear articulation of why HCI 3.0 is necessary, reinforcing the rationale for new interaction paradigms introduced with HAII. Kim contrasts the passive system usage emphasized in HCI 2.0 with the dynamic, AI-powered systems of today. While HCI 2.0 focused on how users utilize pre-defined systems, HCI 3.0 reflects the reality of AI systems that learn and adapt independently. This shift underscores the importance of designing interactions that accommodate the proactive nature of AI.

For instance, Kim introduces the term “Human-AI Interaction” to describe this new paradigm. The concept resonates with ongoing discussions in the field of HCI and AI ethics. Recent studies (Yang et al., 2022; Lee & See, 2004) highlight the need for trust and transparency in AI systems, reinforcing Kim’s argument that interaction design must evolve alongside technological capabilities.

To ground the concept of HAII in practical terms, HCI 3.0 uses digital health products as compelling examples of these new design principles. This helps illustrate how HAII effectively bridges the gap between theory and practice in real-world scenarios. Digital health products are especially suited for this purpose because they require precise, reliable interactions and real-time decision-making, both of which are enhanced by AI. These products also highlight the importance of user trust, clear communication, and adaptive design, which are essential for ensuring effective and accessible healthcare solutions.

Kim explores how digital biomarkers—objective, quantifiable data collected via digital devices—enhance health monitoring and diagnosis. One example is the app “Anxirex,” which uses heart rate variability (HRV), facial micro-expressions, and clinical scale responses to assess mental health risks. AI algorithms reduce noise from environmental factors like lighting and movement, ensuring accurate assessments.

This case study underscores a critical point: advanced AI technology alone does not guarantee effective digital health systems. Without user-friendly interaction design, even the most sophisticated AI can fail to deliver value. Kim’s emphasis on clear communication of procedures, such as HRV measurement, highlights the need for HCI 3.0. This aligns with current research on user-centered design in healthcare technology (Kushniruk & Borycki, 2017; Zhang et al., 2019).

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) further underscores the importance of user experience in digital health, reinforcing the need for user-centered design to ensure the success and safety of these products. Their evaluation framework underscores how critical user-centered design is for ensuring the success and safety of digital health products. Their evaluation framework for digital therapeutic devices includes three key components: real-world health analytics (e.g., clinical safety), user experience analytics (e.g., satisfaction and usability), and product performance analytics (e.g., security and reliability) (FDA, 2021).

Kim’s work provides practical insights into addressing these components through HCI 3.0. By emphasizing user-centered design, Kim highlights how each component of the FDA framework can be effectively integrated into the development of AI-powered digital health products.

A distinguishing feature of HCI 3.0 is its ability to bridge theoretical principles with practical applications. Kim revisits foundational HCI concepts, such as reliability, and contextualizes them within AI-driven systems. For example, while traditional digital products emphasize maintaining consistent performance (e.g., accurate glucose readings for diabetic patients), AI-powered systems must also consider probabilistic decision-making and the limitations of machine learning models.

This nuanced discussion of reliability reflects contemporary research on AI system dependability. Amershi et al. (2019) discuss the importance of designing AI systems that can handle uncertainty and provide appropriate feedback to users. Kim’s analysis aligns with these findings, offering a cohesive framework for integrating AI into HCI design.

Kim’s insights bridge theory with actionable strategies, offering valuable guidance for anyone navigating the complexities of modern HCI. Researchers can appreciate the theoretical depth, students benefit from the structured learning path, and industry professionals gain practical strategies. This comprehensive approach ensures that HCI 3.0 remains relevant across academic and professional domains. The book’s clear frameworks and real-world examples make it adaptable to both academic study and professional practice, ensuring readers can effectively navigate and design AI-integrated systems. The book’s detailed explanations of the digital product design process—from analysis and planning to evaluation—make it a useful resource for teaching and practice. For educators, the book’s structured approach provides a clear framework for guiding students through the complexities of modern HCI.

Furthermore, professionals in fields like digital health, fintech, and autonomous systems can benefit from the practical examples and case studies. The book not only offers theoretical insights but also provides actionable strategies for designing user-centered AI systems. This blend of theory and practice ensures that HCI 3.0 remains relevant in both academic and professional contexts.

In HCI 3.0, Jin-Woo Kim offers a timely and insightful exploration of how AI is reshaping human-computer interaction. By combining updated theoretical concepts with practical case studies, Kim provides a comprehensive guide for navigating the challenges and opportunities of AI-driven design. The book’s emphasis on user-centered principles and clear communication makes it an essential resource for anyone involved in HCI research, education, or practice. As AI continues to evolve, HCI 3.0 serves as a valuable roadmap for designing interactions that are both effective and meaningful.

References

Amershi S., Weld D., Vorvoreanu M., Fourney A., Nushi B., Collisson P., Horvitz E.. 2019. Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In : Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233.
FDA. 2021. Digital health: Mobile medical applications Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence.
Kushniruk A. W., Borycki E. M.. 2017;Integrating user-centered design and technology-driven strategies in healthcare. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 26(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2017-002.
Lee J. D., See K. A.. 2004;Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors 46(1):50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.
Yang Q., Steinfeld A., Rosenthal S., Zimmerman J.. 2022;Re-examining trust in AI-assisted diagnosis. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 37(4):327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1876726.
Zhang J., Patel V. L., Johnson T. R.. 2019;Medical error: Is the solution medical or cognitive? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 19(1):20–23. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000401.

Article information Continued